Trump’s $1.8B ‘slush fund’ appears to violate a mandate created more than a year ago: legal experts

The Trump administration’s $1.776 billion compensation fund for alleged “victims” of “weaponization” appears to violate and contradict a mandate set out by ousted Attorney General Pam Bondi last year, according to legal experts.

Recipients of the fund, announced by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche last week as part of a settlement after President Donald Trump abandoned his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, will likely remain a secret.

While Blanche — who, like Bondi is a former Trump personal attorney — has stated that Trump and his family are not eligible for the fund, the president’s donors, allies, and supporters have not been ruled out.

Now, former Justice Department officials have pointed to a February 2025 directive issued by Bondi that appears to contradict the compensation fund because it could see major payouts awarded to people or groups who are not involved in an underlying lawsuit, according to The New York Times.

The memo, titled “Reinstating the Prohibitions on Improper Third Party Settlements,” sets out how the department should not use settlements “to require payments to nongovernmental, third-party organizations that were neither victims nor parties to the lawsuits,” except in limited circumstances.

open image in gallery

“The new fund, however, appears to be structured to steer a large pot of money to third-party claimants, most of whom have not filed suits and may never file suits now that there is a fund,” The Times reports.

“I’ve just never seen litigation risk outside the four corners of the complaint being used as justification for something in a totally unrelated lawsuit,” Jennifer Ricketts, who worked at the Justice Department’s civil division, told the newspaper.

The Independent has contacted the Justice Department for comment.

Bondi’s memo aimed to end arrangements made during the Obama administration that saw money handed to nongovernmental organizations, which conservatives viewed as “advancing ideological goals,” The Times reports.

open image in gallery

Blanche said the compensation fund was “unusual” but “not unprecedented” when confronted by Democrats this week. He gave the example of an Obama-era compensation fund to end a decades-long class-action lawsuit from Native American farmers who experienced discrimination by the federal government.

Trump’s agreement, which applies only to existing audits, could spare the president and his family from a more than $100 million tax penalty.

The president said Wednesday that he was not involved int he settlement. “I guess they made a settlement of some kind. I wasn’t involved in the settlement, I could have been involved, but I didn't choose to be, so they made a settlement,” he told reporters.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies