The Last of Us Part 2's major death "was controversial internally too," says former Naughty Dog dev: "The studio was pretty split"
Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more
By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
Explore An account already exists for this email address, please log in. Subscribe to our newsletterThe Last of Us Part 2's decision to kill off a major character had the developers at Naughty Dog split, according to a former dev.
On the off chance you know anything about The Last of Us Part 2 but have somehow avoided knowing about the game's major death, spoilers ahead.
Speaking to Kiwi Talkz, Heather Cerlan – a former Naughty Dog artist who worked on The Last of Us and Uncharted series – was asked if the studio knew that The Last of Us 2 was going to be controversial ahead of its release. She responds, "Oh yeah, most of the studio was like, 'really you're going to...'" before pausing for the sake of spoilers. But of course, we're talking about Joel getting killed off in the opening hours of the game.
Article continues below #207 - Heather Cerlan Interview On Naughty Dog, Bethesda, Last Of Us, Hawthorn, Creation Engine - YouTube
Watch On
Cerlan continues, "I think the studio was pretty split on the outcome of what happens," saying "it was controversial internally too." And of course, it ended up pretty controversial outside of the studio, too, with the leaked plot details ahead of The Last of Us Part 2's release setting off an online discourse that was as obnoxious as it was for Star Wars: The Last Jedi.
Personally I'm in the camp of there shouldn't have been a sequel to The Last of Us in the first place, but if you have to do one, killing off Joel pretty much has to be a given, because really, what else is there to do with him after his arc in the first game? Him getting got after his actions at the end of the The Last of Us Part 1 – which was originally way more interesting without a sequel and co-creator Neil Druckmann ruining any of the interesting ambiguity it had left by saying a cure would've been made from Ellie's sacrifice – was the natural conclusion to that.
Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter TOPICS CATEGORIES
Scott has been freelancing for over three years across a number of different gaming publications, first appearing on GamesRadar+ in 2024. He has also written for the likes of PC Gamer, Eurogamer, VG247, Play, TechRadar, and others. He's typically rambling about Metal Gear Solid, God Hand, or any other PS2-era titles that rarely (if ever) get sequels.
View MoreYou must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
Logout LATEST ARTICLES
1Call of Duty watch your flank – a Battlefield movie has been announced and Michael B. Jordan may star- 2Far Cry showrunner isn't adapting one game because "games are built in a way that doesn't make for the best drama"
- 3Gen V star speaks out on surprise cancelation: "There's so much I wanna (and will) say"
- 4The Maul – Shadow Lord team break down the episode 8 visions sequence that brought Sam Witwer to "tears"
- 5Maul – Shadow Lord episode 8 connects the Star Wars show to Solo in a big way
Схожі новини
Аша Шарма о возвращении эксклюзивов на Xbox: "Решение с последствиями на десятилетия"
Clair Obscur: Expecition 33's Monolith Set Is Getting Restocked Today
How To Get And Use Quantum Essence In Starfield