UK | EN |
LIVE
Світ 🇬🇧 Велика Британія

South African government rejects US claim of a humanitarian emergency for white people

The Independent — World Michelle Gumede 1 переглядів 3 хв читання

South Africa’s government and prominent advocacy groups representing the country’s white Afrikaner minority have firmly rejected the Trump administration’s assertion of a humanitarian emergency affecting white people in the nation.

This claim served as the Trump administration’s justification for an unprecedented move to raise the U.S. refugee cap exclusively for white Afrikaners.

The administration announced it would admit an additional 10,000 white South Africans as refugees this year, increasing its annual quota while simultaneously blocking individuals from other countries from entering through the program.

Donald Trump cited an "unforeseen emergency refugee situation," blaming the South African government for "recent increases in the incitement of racially motivated violence," though he provided no specific evidence.

South African Foreign Ministry spokesperson Chrispin Phiri dismissed accusations of systemic persecution against Afrikaners as unfounded, noting that some beneficiaries of the refugee program have even chosen to return to South Africa.

Approximately 6,000 South Africans have relocated to the U.S. since the Afrikaner-specific program began last year, according to U.S. government figures.

Afrikaner trade union Solidariteit stated that refugee status is not a viable solution for Afrikaners, who should instead thrive within South Africa.

(Reuters)

Spokesman Jaco Kleynhans expressed unawareness of any "unforeseen emergency refugee situation" for Afrikaners, adding that the union "is in no way aware of anything that the Trump administration could be referring to," while respecting U.S. refugee policy autonomy.

Similarly, AfriForum, a lobbying organization for the white Afrikaner minority with over 300,000 members, confirmed it "does not have information" supporting the specific assertion of an emergency refugee situation.

Its CEO, Kallie Kriel, emphasized the group’s focus on "fighting to create the circumstances in South Africa where there is no need for Afrikaners to leave."

The Trump administration, which suspended the U.S. refugee program on its first day in office, has since repurposed it to primarily facilitate the entry of Afrikaners—white South Africans largely descended from Dutch settlers—into the United States.

Critics argue this decision to focus a decades-old program on a single group has left countless individuals fleeing war and strife globally stranded with limited options.

Refugee organizations have questioned the prioritization of white South Africans over those from countries facing severe conflict and natural disasters, especially given that vetting for U.S. refugee status often spans years.

Bryony Fox, a social justice researcher at South Africa's Stellenbosch University, highlighted that the Trump administration’s preference for white Afrikaner refugee admissions raises significant concerns about selective humanitarianism, inconsistent refugee protection, and the favoring of privileged groups while ignoring others experiencing profound hardships.

She warned, "This risks politicizing refugee protection in a way that may ultimately weaken the legitimacy and universality of the refugee regime itself."

Поділитися

Схожі новини