UK | EN |
LIVE
Крипто 🇺🇸 США

Nearly 10% of Bitcoin supply is ‘structurally unsafe’ from quantum breakthrough: Glassnode

CoinTelegraph Cointelegraph by Zoltan Vardai 0 переглядів 4 хв читання
Nearly 10% of Bitcoin supply is ‘structurally unsafe’ from quantum breakthrough: Glassnode
Written by Zoltan Vardai⁠, Staff Writer. Reviewed by Robert Lakin⁠, Staff Editor. Written by Zoltan Vardai⁠, Staff Writer. Reviewed by Robert Lakin⁠, Staff Editor. Nearly 10% of Bitcoin supply is ‘structurally unsafe’ from quantum breakthrough: GlassnodeLatest NewsPublishedMay 20, 2026

Analytics provider Glassnode identified 10% of Bitcoin supply as structurally exposed to a quantum breakthrough, underscoring the need for a quantum-proof implementation such as BIP-360.

Nearly 10% of the total Bitcoin supply is considered “structurally unsafe” due to a quantum computing breakthrough, as their output type reveals the public key by design, regardless of address management practices, according to data analytics platform Glassnode.

Totaling about 1.92 million Bitcoin (BTC), the group includes BTC from early Satoshi-era Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) outputs, legacy multi-sig structures such as Pay-to-Multisig (P2MS) and modern Pay-to-Taproot (P2TR) outputs, which reveal the public key or public key-equivalent by design, wrote Glassnode in a Wednesday X post.

Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto’s coins represent about 1.1 million or 5.5% of the vulnerable supply, following another 620,000 Satoshi-era coins or 3.1% of the supply and about 200,000 coins or 1% of the supply in Taproot addresses.

Choosing how to implement PQC [post-quantum cryptography] and deploy it on-chain should remain decoupled from the question of what to do about coins that remain quantum vulnerable. Yet the two matters often are conflated, the controversy around the latter often clouding discussions of the former - ARK Invest

The findings underscore the need to implement a quantum-proof path for Bitcoin, such as the adoption of BIP-360's proposed Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) output type, which seeks to remove Taproot’s quantum-vulnerable key path spend, though it does not itself add post-quantum digital signatures. 

While 9.6% of the total supply remains structurally exposed, a significant part of this exposure “could be reduced if wallet infrastructure, address standards, and user behavior evolve,” added Glassnode.

However, this supply would only be vulnerable to quantum theft if quantum computers can break Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), which would require about 2,330 logical qubits and tens of millions to billions of quantum gates, according to a March white paper published by US investment manager Ark Invest.

Source: Glassnode

Nearly 70% of Bitcoin’s supply is safe from quantum computing threat

Glassnode estimates that about 13.99 million Bitcoin, representing 69.8% of the total supply, remain unexposed to a quantum computing threat, which is largely in line with Ark Invest’s figures, which show that 65% of the supply was safe, Cointelegraph reported in March.

Still, the analytics provider notes that about 4.12 million BTC, or 20.6% of the total supply, are “operationally unsafe,” meaning that these coins are exposed due to a key or address management issue.

Source: Glassnode

Entity-level data shows that the holdings of some large corporate entities are exposed. This includes 100% of BTC held by Franklin Templeton, WisdomTree and Robinhood, 99% of neobank Revolut’s Bitcoin, 52% of Grayscale’s holdings and just 2% of Fidelity’s Bitcoin stash.

Related: Bernstein says Bitcoin market already priced in quantum risk

Looking at the exposed tokens of cryptocurrency exchanges, only about 5% of BTC held on Coinbase is exposed, compared to 85% of Binance’s BTC and about 100% of the holdings on Bitfinex exchange.

To reduce exposure, exchanges and custodians are advised to reduce key reuse, improve address hygiene and plan a migration into a quantum-proof format to position for a future quantum breakthrough, wrote Glassnode.

Magazine: Bitcoin vs. the quantum computer threat — Timeline and solutions (2025–2035)

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

More on the subject

Bitcoin sees fresh US sell-off as markets await Nvidia 'biggest earnings event'1 hour agoWilliam SubergBitcoin’s momentum is fading: Traders have these support levels in mind6 hours agoNancy LubaleData shows Bitcoin dip buyers waiting for lower prices: Is $70K BTC’s next stop?21 hours agoBiraajmaan TamulyBitcoin sees fresh US sell-off as markets await Nvidia 'biggest earnings event'1 hour agoWilliam SubergBitcoin’s momentum is fading: Traders have these support levels in mind6 hours agoNancy LubaleData shows Bitcoin dip buyers waiting for lower prices: Is $70K BTC’s next stop?21 hours agoBiraajmaan Tamuly
Поділитися

Схожі новини